LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/American Joint Replacement Registry Receives Special Designation
Large Joints and Extremities

American Joint Replacement Registry Receives Special Designation

June 25, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

American Joint Replacement Registry Receives Special Designation
William J. Maloney, M.D. / Sources: Stanford University and American Joint Replacement Registry
Secondary

The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) has been designated as a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), meaning that it will be able to provide an enhanced array of medical outcome data, including patient safety information. Other information will include physician and patient observations and joint replacement concerns. AJRR is one of 41 organizations given such a designation.

According to the news release, “the QCDR program is part of the CMS Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), a data collection effort that utilizes reimbursement incentives to encourage the reporting of patient outcomes. Currently, eligible professionals (primarily physicians) provide data and information directly to CMS. With the new program, physicians will provide information directly to a designated QCDR.”

“Currently, AJRR receives data from 1, 800 orthopaedic surgeons performing more than 100, 000 procedures at 170 hospitals in 48 states. Next year, AJRR hopes to expand its data collection to include more than 250, 000 procedures, and include physician as well as patient feedback on outcomes. Working with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), AJRR hopes to expand its data collection to include other orthopaedic procedures.“

Patients will not be left out of this data-gathering effort, and for the first time will have the chance to offer online feedback regarding outcomes, side-effects, etc. as related to their treatment and device. And, from January 1, 2015, “physicians who send outcome data to an appropriate and accredited QCDR will receive higher CMS reimbursements.”

Through this new program and accreditation, “more orthopaedic surgeons will provide a broader range of data, and encourage their patients to do the same, on important hip and knee replacement outcomes, including side-effects, pain relief and post-surgical mobility, ” said William J. Maloney, M.D., chair of the AJRR board of directors, and chair of orthopaedic surgery at Stanford University Medical Center in the May 31, 2014 news release. “The collection of this information through one central registry has the potential to significantly improve orthopaedic outcomes, including patient safety.”

“These registries put patients first, ” said AAOS President Frederick M. Azar. “Patients need to know that there is a platform for sharing their joint-replacement perceptions and experiences. The Academy looks forward to working with AJRR to expand the number of procedures included in the data compilation shared with CMS to ultimately provide safer, more successful and cost-effective orthopaedic care.”

Dr. Maloney told OTW, “Hip and Knee Arthroplasty remains AJRR’s primary focus, however we are open to being a resource for the AAOS and Orthopaedic specialty societies as they gain interest in widespread data collection. With appropriate funding the AJRR could serve as a platform for these efforts.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy