LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/ACSM Declares Washington, DC Fittest City (but Still Fat!)
Company News

ACSM Declares Washington, DC Fittest City (but Still Fat!)

June 12, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

ACSM Declares Washington, DC Fittest City (but Still Fat!)
WWII Memorial and Lincoln Memorial / Source: Wikimedia Commons and rdsmith4
Secondary

What city in America has the fittest population? According to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) report, the fittest city, this year, is Washington, DC. The rating system, called the “index” was started in 2008 and concerns such issues as chronic diseases, access to health care, the level of obesity and policies that support and encourage physical activity.

Writing about the award in Bodywork, Erin Beresini raised the issue of how what she called “slacker cities” such as Indianapolis and Oklahoma City—which consistently received low rankings—were holding up. Both cities have received grants from ACSM to initiate locally driven health improvement efforts.

Unfortunately, according to Beresini, obesity in Oklahoma City has risen from 28.6% of the population in 2011 to 32.6% in 2014. On the good news side, the percent of people smoking fell from 22.8% to 20%. Obesity in Indianapolis also increased, from 28.2% to 30.1% of the population, while the percent of people smoking remained about the same at 21.6%.

Citizens of Oklahoma City and Indianapolis should not feel too badly. Washington, DC, this year’s winner city, saw its own obesity rates rise between 2011 and 2014, from 21.4% to 24.1%.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy