LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/NuVasive’s Double-Digit First Quarter
Company News

NuVasive’s Double-Digit First Quarter

May 1, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

NuVasive’s Double-Digit First Quarter
NuVasive, Inc.
Secondary

NuVasive Inc.’s first quarter sales rise of 11.3% made Wall Street happy and prompted Piper Jaffray analyst Matt Miksic to write that the results demonstrate the company’s aptitude for “sustainable execution and share gains.” It sounds like he was channeling company Chairman and CEO Alex Lukianov’s mantra of, “Onwards and Upwards.”

Sales of $177.5 million included a 9% increase in lumbar and cervical core fusion sales, a 9% rise in biologic products and 11% in intra-operative monitoring (IOM). The company’s focus on going international produced a 34% increase in sales. During a conference call with analysts on April 29, 2014, Lukianov reiterated the company expects to reach revenue of $725 million for the year.

NuVasive_EarningsTable_WEBLukianov pointed to increased physician training in Japan, the world’s second largest spine market, and increased international adoption rates as reasons for the rise in overseas sales. Overall growth was driven by new product launches and increasing productivity from new sales reps hired over the last year.

Stable and Improving Spine Market

The tone of the spine market, according to Lukianov, remains stable and improving with physician-owned distributor (POD’s) sales flattening or declining, and payor pressure generally stable. He noted that the North American Spine Society (NASS) and other spine societies are becoming increasingly active on the advocacy front to fight payor pushback. Lukianov also said that numerous hospital networks have increased disclosure requirements for physicians and spine companies making it more difficult for PODs to do business within these networks. He believes that the prevalence of PODs has likely peaked, but does not expect any material impact on growth in 2014.

Larry Biegelsen of Wells Fargo wrote that smaller spine companies continue to take share. In the first quarter, NuVasive (+11%), Globus Medical, Inc. (+9%) and LDR (+20%), grew significantly faster than DePuy Synthes (flat) and estimated flat Medtronic, Inc. core spine growth.

Looking ahead to the remainder of 2014, Biegelsen said AttraX biologic, which “had moved to the side for several quarters now appears to be not-dead.” Management is continuing to work with the FDA, submitting additional preclinical work. The company hopes to receive an answer from the FDA by end-2014. In addition, the launch of Osteocel Pro is “going well.”

Lukianov: “Evolving the Organization”

“Results in the first quarter of 2014 were solidly in line with our expectations, and place us on track to achieve full year guidance by continuing to execute our share-taking strategy. While staying true to NuVasive’s core philosophy of driving innovation to improve spine patient outcomes, we are evolving our organization to maintain a start-up mentality and to continue to lead spine innovation as a much larger, and increasingly profitable, global organization, ” said Lukianov.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy