LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/75% of Doctors Accuse Colleagues of Unnecessary Procedures
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

75% of Doctors Accuse Colleagues of Unnecessary Procedures

May 30, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

75% of Doctors Accuse Colleagues of Unnecessary Procedures
Wikimedia Commons and Ninianpeckitt
Secondary

Seventy-five percent of doctors think their contemporaries order at least one unnecessary test or procedure a week, according to a survey by Choosing Wisely reported by writer Zack Budryk of Fierce HealthCare.

The reasons physicians gave for ordering extraneous tests were malpractice concerns (52%), to be extra cautious (36%), to get more information so as to reassure themselves on their diagnosis (30%) and patient insistence on the procedure (28%). About 5% said they had been motivated by the fee-for-service system.

Budryk wrote that 47% of the respondents reported that one patient a week requests an unnecessary test or procedure. When that happens, 48% of the doctors reported that they advise the patient against it but eventually defer to the patient’s wishes.

“I think we’re afraid of not being liked, ” Donald Ford, M.D., a vice president at Hillcrest Hospital in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, told Kaiser Health News. “We want to be the hero to the patient.”

None of the doctors responding to the survey thought that Medicare was in the best position to address the problem and more than half (58%) put the responsibility for correcting the problem on the doctors themselves. More than three in four (78%) of those who responded said it would help to have more time to talk with patients and 61% said that changing the system of payment so physicians were not incentivized to order more tests would be effective.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy