LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Research Ends Shoe Sole Debate
Large Joints and Extremities

Research Ends Shoe Sole Debate

April 9, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Research Ends Shoe Sole Debate
Wikimedia Commons and Zalman 992
Secondary

Still trying to decide if hard or soft soles on their shoes protect runners from injury? If so, give up because a new study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine has found that the hardness of the sole makes no difference.

According to Stephen Kasica, writing for Outside, researchers at the Sports Medicine Research Laboratory in Luxembourg hypothesized that runners training on a hard midsole had a higher risk of running-related injuries than did runners running in soft shoes. To test their assumption they monitored 247 runners wearing 12mm-drop trainers from “a renowned sports equipment manufacturer.” Some subjects wore cushioned shoes, and others wore a midsole that was 15% stiffer in the heel.

When they examined the runners five months later, the researchers found that the runners who wore the cushioned shoes had just as many injuries as did the group wearing the harder shoes. They also found that soft shoes did not protect the heavier runners from injury.

“Midsole hardness of modern cushioned running shoes did not influence running-related injury risk, ” researchers wrote. More relevant to the prediction of injury was the runner’s body mass index, his or her history of injury, rate of exertion, history of regular running and involvement in other sports on a regular basis.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy