LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Regional Anesthetic Does NOT Increase Fall Risk
Large Joints and Extremities

Regional Anesthetic Does NOT Increase Fall Risk

March 6, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Regional Anesthetic Does NOT Increase Fall Risk
Courtesy: Anesthesiology, the journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists
Secondary

Does the kind of anesthesia used during knee replacement surgery increase the odds that the patient is at risk for a post-surgery fall? Research has shown that regional forms of anesthesia—spinal or epidural (neuraxial) anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks (PNB)—provide better pain control, faster rehabilitation and fewer complications than does general anesthesia. But surgeons have been reluctant to use them out of a fear that motor weakness, brought on by the regional anesthetic, may cause patients to fall in the first days after surgery.

A study based on almost 200, 000 patient records, published in the March issue of Anesthesiology, debunks that belief. “We found that not only do these types of anesthesia not increase the risk of falls, but also spinal or epidural anesthesia may even decrease the risk compared to general anesthesia, ” said Stavros G. Memtsoudis, M.D., Ph.D., professor of anesthesiology and public health and director of critical care services, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, and lead author. “This work suggests that fear of in-hospital falls is not a reason to avoid regional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery.”

Surgeons have been right to be concerned about falls. Patients who fall within 30 days of knee surgery are more likely to have worse outcomes, including more heart and lung problems and higher rates of death. As a result doctors have used spinal or epidural anesthesia and PNB far less often than general anesthesia because of concern that regional forms of anesthesia may increase muscle weakness and make patients more prone to falls.

When researchers analyzed the types of anesthesia used in 191, 570 knee replacement surgeries in the Premier Perspective database they found that 76.2% of patients had general anesthesia, 10.9% had spinal or epidural anesthesia, and 12.9% had a combination of neuraxial and general anesthesia. In addition, 12.1% of all patients had PNB.

When they examined the type of anesthesia used for those who suffered a fall in the hospital they found that, of patients who had general anesthesia, 1.62% fell, compared to 1.3% of those who had neuraxial anesthesia and 1.5% who had general and neuraxial anesthesia. Patients who received a PNB had a fall rate of 1.58%.

The data used in the study came from a wide range of hospital settings. The researchers found that the fear of patient falls, as related to the kind of anesthetic used, to be unfounded. They noted that hospitals and physicians performing joint replacement procedures use effective fall-prevention programs.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy