LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/One-Bill Joint Surgery Growing
Large Joints and Extremities

One-Bill Joint Surgery Growing

February 18, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

One-Bill Joint Surgery Growing
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Secondary

Is the practice of charging one inclusive payment for surgical services, sometimes called “bundled payments, ” the future of joint replacement surgery? Executives at Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina (BCBSNC) and the surgeons at Triangle Orthopaedic Associates (TOA) believe that it is.

Instead of billing separately for the surgeon, hospital, physical therapist, anesthesiologist and others, the two organizations, since 2012, have cooperated to provide for one-bill replacement surgery for knees. And on November 1, 2013, they began offering the same flat fee bundled terms for hip replacements. The surgeries are performed at North Carolina Specialty Hospital in Durham.

BCBSNC spokespersons Elaine Daniels and Lew Borman told OTW that insurers are moving away from the traditional fee for service reimbursement model to one that involves paying for a service. Both said they saw this system as the wave of the future in funding joint replacement. Daniels said that when they began paying a flat fee for knee replacements, they “expected to see positive results with this. Instead”, she said, “the results have been transformative.”

Among the positive results seen in knee replacement surgery were average cost savings of more than 22%, outcomes better than national benchmarks, a reduction in avoidable complications as compared to other total knee replacements performed in North Carolina and a patient satisfaction rating of 97%.

“The cost of a hip replacement surgery and follow-up care in North Carolina can range from $22, 000 to $52, 000, and the prices of many surgeries aren’t always available to patients when surgeries are scheduled, ” said Brad Wilson, BCBSNC president and CEO. “This lack of transparency drives up health care costs more than $100 billion in the U.S. each year. Our new agreement with TOA takes the guesswork out of paying for hip replacement surgeries. The one-time payment will be 10-20% less than the average cost of hip replacements in North Carolina.”

Under the agreement between BCBSNC and TOA, customers will pay TOA a one-time fixed rate for hip replacement surgeries rather than receive multiple bills. Officials of both firms say that this approach, also known as coordinated care, improves efficiency, reduces unnecessary paperwork and ultimately lowers health care costs.

The agreement between BCBSNC and TOA covers all appointments and care occurring during the inpatient stay, including the total hip replacement surgery and care related to any complications and all related post-operative care for 90 days after surgery, including physical therapy and follow-up care received at TOA.

“We know this approach to care works from the results we’re already seeing from our knee replacement agreement, ” said Thomas A. Dimmig, M.D., president of Triangle Orthopaedic Associates. “We are pleased to work with BCBSNC again to bring another high quality, lower-cost orthopedic surgery option to BCBSNC customers.”

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina delivers health care products, services and information to more than 3.74 million members, including approximately 1 million served on behalf of other Blue Plans. The company was recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by Ethisphere Institute in 2012 and 2013. The company is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy