LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Study: Pinnacle’s InFill Trumps Traditional Methods
Spine

Study: Pinnacle’s InFill Trumps Traditional Methods

January 10, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study: Pinnacle’s InFill Trumps Traditional Methods
InFill Graft Delivery System / Courtesy: Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC
Secondary

Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC is announcing that an independent study has found that its InFill Graft Delivery System performed better than traditional prepacking methods. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel graft filling technique for maximizing interbody space and implant filling and optimizing endplate surface contact with the graft.

The study, conducted by Burak M. Ozgur M.D., FAANS and Erin Gleckman PA-C, of Newport Beach, California, demonstrated a successful increase in interbody space and cage filling, with greatly enhanced endplate surface contact. Volumetric analysis 3-D CT scanning confirmed that up to 94% more graft material can be placed and contained between the vertebrae, including endplate surface contour filling and contact, when compared to traditional prepacking methods

Zach Sowell, VP of Marketing told OTW, “We are very pleased with the outcome of the study. The results prove that a surgeon can achieve greater contact between the graft material and the vertebral bodies when using the InFill Graft Delivery System over the traditional method of pre-packing the implant.”

The InFill Graft Delivery System was designed around the concept of placing autogenous graft material into the graft chamber of the implant in situ. It can be used to bulk up a pre-packed implant, or for a complete fill of the implant to maximize contact with the vertebral endplates.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy