LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Study Debunks Arthritis Dietary Supplements
Large Joints and Extremities

Study Debunks Arthritis Dietary Supplements

January 8, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study Debunks Arthritis Dietary Supplements
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Penarc
Secondary

Do the dietary supplements glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate slow joint damage in the knees of people suffering from mild arthritis? Past studies have said “no.” A recent new study of the effectiveness of the supplements—that measured more than 30 parts of the knee joint—resulted in a “maybe.” Among the people who took the supplements over a period of two years, only a few parts of the knee joint differed from those who did not take any supplements.

The experts continue to differ on the subject. Daniel Solomon, M.D., M.P.H., a rheumatologist and pharmaco-epidemiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston (who was not involved in the study) said, “This is yet another set of data arguing against any disease-modifying benefit of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate.”

Another researcher, Krishna Chaganti, M.D., M.S., a rheumatologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who also was not involved in the study, said “[The results] may reflect that drugs or therapies that affect joint structure in osteoarthritis are likely to have an effect earlier in the course of the disease.”

Johanne Martel-Pelletier, Ph.D., of the Osteoarthritis Research Unit at the University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, led the research and was one of the study’s authors. The group examined data on 600 participants in an osteoarthritis study sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Initiative. Bioiberica, a Spanish pharmaceutical company that manufactures glucosamine and chondroitin supplements, funded a part of the study.

Some of the study participants were taking bone-building drugs, some were taking pain relievers such as ibuprofen and others were taking glucosamine and chondroitin supplements.

As reported by Reuters Health, the researchers used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine the spaces between the participants’ joints and monitored the participants’ arthritis symptoms and disease progression over 24 months.

They found that the people who took both anti-inflammatory pain medications and glucosamine and chondroitin supplements had less pain and milder changes due to disease in one part of the knee joint than those who took the pain drugs but no supplements. However, among those who were not taking pain medication, there was no difference in pain between people taking the supplements and those who did not. In the end the people who took supplements had similar disease progression to those who did not take them.

Solomon told Reuters Health that the few statistically significant differences in knee anatomy that were seen may have been due to random variation. His belief as a result of the study is that, in general, the results do not change the bottom line for osteoarthritis patients: glucosamine and chondroitin do not help.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy