LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Smart Socks Track Runner Experience
Large Joints and Extremities

Smart Socks Track Runner Experience

January 20, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Smart Socks Track Runner Experience
Smart Socks – SenSoria / Courtesy: Heapsylon
Secondary

For $175 a pair runners can pull on a pair of “smart socks” that will track how their foot hits the ground, the rhythm of their footfall, count their steps and estimate calories consumed. The manufacturer, Heapsylon, LLC, claims that over time the socks’ sensors will learn how its wearer runs and will alert the wearer to the possibility of injury. The socks made their debut in January at the Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas.

To enable them to do what they do, the socks use inbuilt sensors that connect to an ankle bracelet and then, in turn, to a phone. An app will show users “heat maps” of how their feet strike and are impacted by the ground.

Heapsylon representatives say the socks will be available by March. It is working with Vivobarefeet, a British company that makes shoes that conform in a particular manner to the shape of the foot.

The smart socks are among a host of “wearable technologies” including an Internet-connected toothbrush.

Ben Wood, an analyst with CCS Insights, said more than US$100-million had been invested by the public in “wearables.” He claimed their “explosive growth” could mirror tablet sales over the next few years.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy