LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Titan Spine’s Rough Technology Reaches Smooth Milestones
Company News

Titan Spine’s Rough Technology Reaches Smooth Milestones

November 12, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Titan Spine’s Rough Technology Reaches Smooth Milestones
Endoskeleton Interbody Fusion Devices / Courtesy: Titan Spine, LLC
Secondary

Titan Spine, LLC’s Endoskeleton interbody fusion devices with their unique roughened surface technology have now been implanted 18, 000 times and are approaching a $20 million in annualized sales revenue run-rate.

A company announcement on November 11, 2013 stated the two achievements mark a, “paradigm shift toward devices engineered with roughened titanium surface technology.”

Roughened Surface Technology

The devices feature Titan’s proprietary implant surface technology, consisting of a unique combination of roughened topographies at the macro, micro, and cellular levels. The company says the combination of surface levels is designed to create an optimal host-bone response and actively participate in the fusion process by promoting new bone growth, encouraging natural production of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and creating the potential for a “faster and more robust fusion.”

In addition, the company provided the following updates:

  • Currently implanting more than 5, 300 implants per year
  • Greater than 150 surgeon customers
  • Exceeding 60 U.S. distributors
  • 40% year-over-year revenue growth for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013
  • No Medical Device Reports (MDR’s) since the company’s inception
  • Recent distribution agreement with Biomet Spine is expected to accelerate sales growth in Germany

Cell Signaling Properties

Kade Huntsman, M.D., orthopedic spine surgeon with the Salt Lake Orthopaedic Clinic in Salt Lake City, Utah, said one of the reasons he believes Titan’s interbody devices have resonated well with surgeons is because of the strength and design of the implant combined with the cell signaling properties of its surface technology. “I like that its roughened surface technology is created from a reductive process and does not possess a coating that could have the potential for delamination or degradation.”

Addressing Shortcomings of PEEK

Advertisement

Titan’s President Kevin Gemas said he is encouraged to see several other companies adopting the Titan Spine approach by launching interbody devices with roughened surfaces. He said those companies are beginning to acknowledge “shortcomings with their standard PEEK and smooth titanium offerings.” He added that Titan has been optimizing its surface technology and its bone formation effects for the past six years through collaboration with thought leaders in materials science and biomedical engineering. “[We] feel that our commitment to be the leaders in surface technology is the reason we are starting to see rapid acceleration in our sales growth.”

Titan Spine is located in Mequon, Wisconsin and Laichingen, Germany. The company markets a full line of interbody devices featuring its proprietary textured surface through its sales force and a network of independent distributors.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy