LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/NuVasive’s Big 3rd Quarter Beat
Company News

NuVasive’s Big 3rd Quarter Beat

November 3, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

NuVasive’s Big 3rd Quarter Beat
Image created by RRY Publications, LLC
Secondary

NuVasive, Inc., built for speed and growth, continued with double-digit revenue growth in the third quarter. The 14% growth over last year’s third quarter to $169.2 million wasn’t the heady 20%+ growth rate of years past, but still way over the market which is only growing in the lower single digits.

“NUVA put up a big $10 million beat, ” wrote Jefferies analyst Raj Denhoy.

Third quarter sales prompted company management to up full 2013 guidance from $655 million to $670 million. Net income was $18.3 million. Cash and equivalents assets came in at $303 million. The company is still, ultimately, shooting for $1 billion in revenue.

In making the sales announcement on October 29, 2013, Alex Lukianov, chairman and CEO, said, “The execution of our market share taking strategy has been outstanding through the first three quarters of 2013, and we are pleased to be increasing full year revenue and non-GAAP operating margin guidance to reflect solid outperformance. We are building on the momentum established at Eurospine and at NASS [North American Spine Society] to close this year well and kick off 2014 with continued strategic execution!”

The company saw accelerating sales growth in lumbar (+12%), cervical (+27%) and biologics (+11%) and international (+31%). Monitoring sales were down 4% as the business is still hampered by reimbursement problems.

Spine Market Improving

During a call with analysts, Lukianov said last quarter’s reported results suggest that U.S. spine market growth improved slightly from the flattish rate of growth experienced all of last year and into the first quarter of this year. “We are encouraged by the improvement, but we still believe that the market is stabilizing. As a result, we are wary of calling a quarter or two of improvement in market growth a trend. We expect U.S. market growth will be flattish this year and into 2014.”

Fighting Insurer Pushbacks and PODs

Advertisement

He said progress has been made against some of the market dynamics that have been pressuring growth for the last several years. “The publication of the systematic literature review on fusion for degenerative disc disease in the April issue of the journal Spine is being used to fight insurer pushback against lumbar spine fusion on a case-by-case basis.”

While not directly attributing market share gains to a recent Office of Inspector General POD (physician-owned distributor) alert, Lukianov said the competition from PODs appears to be slowing. He noted the development and implementation of anti-POD policies by several hospital systems. “However, we believe that PODs will likely need to be dismantled on a grand scale to materially impact market growth.”

DePuySynthes Integration Woes

Lukianov was asked about DePuySynthes’ acknowledged difficulties with integration of their spine team. Did he think NuVasive benefitted from that?

“I think that there’s been an ongoing abundance of qualified salespeople, and they’ve certainly been coming from the major players in our general direction. Needless to say, there’s always some churn. But there’s definitely an abundance. I wouldn’t say it’s entirely changed. I think the entire acquisition has obviously created a fair amount of disruption among the distribution networks. So yes, I think [it’s had] an impact.”

Jefferies’ Denhoy says he sees NuVasive poised for above market growth/share gains on a combination of recent product launches (Bendini System, MAS PLIF, PCM Cervical Disc) and continued penetration of XLIF in Japan.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy