LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Integra Goes “Hollywood” Intervertebrally
Spine

Integra Goes “Hollywood” Intervertebrally

November 6, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Integra Goes “Hollywood” Intervertebrally
Vertebral Column / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Anatomist90
Secondary

The FDA has issued a 510 (k) clearance for Integra LifeSciences Holding Corporation’s Hollywood NanoMetalene Interbody Device (IBD). The IBD is to be used primarily for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

According to the October press release, “The PEEK-OPTIMA polymer used in the Hollywood NanoMetalene IBD underwent a proprietary high-energy, low temperature surface process that created a titanium coating around the implant, including the graft window. Company officials say that the ultrathin coating does not affect postoperative imaging and the surgeon’s ability to view the operative area and determine the extent of the vertebral body fusion.”

In its press release the company reported that it expects to begin a controlled U.S. release of the interbody device this year. Kirt Stephenson, president of U.S. Spine at Integra LifeSciences, stated, “Surgeons prefer the surface characteristics of titanium and the mechanical properties and radiolucency of PEEK-OPTIMA, and the Hollywood NanoMetalene IBD offers a treatment option that incorporates both benefits into one device.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy