LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Cefuroxime Infused Bone Cement Cuts Risks
Large Joints and Extremities

Cefuroxime Infused Bone Cement Cuts Risks

October 24, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Cefuroxime Infused Bone Cement Cuts Risks
Cefuroxime 3D Balls / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Jynto
Secondary

The online publication TeleManagement reports that knee replacement patients are less likely to experience complications following their surgery if surgeons used bone cement along with the antibiotic cefuroxime. Potential complications for diabetics after knee replacement surgery include slow wound healing, problems with fracture healing and lack of sensation in the joint that can lead to un-noticed trauma.

Researchers in Indiana studied the records of over 5, 000 patients who had knee replacement surgery. Six percent had diabetes. They found that deep infections in the operation area ran at 0.7% for people without diabetes, and at 1.2% in the diabetic group. Those diabetics treated with bone cement and the antibiotic cefuroxime were less likely to have a deep infection.

About one in five of people in the United States who are over the age of 65 now have diabetes, according to TeleManagement. That is also the age range where individuals are most likely to need a knee replacement.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy