LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/California’s Reference Pricing Cuts Charges
Large Joints and Extremities

California’s Reference Pricing Cuts Charges

October 2, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

California’s Reference Pricing Cuts Charges
Source: Wikimedia Commons and torbakhopper http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:California_flag.jpg
Secondary

Until recently there has been little incentive for hospitals to reduce the fees they charge for procedures such as hip and knee replacements. Then, about one year ago, the California Pubic Employees Retirement System took on hospitals in the state in regard to the fees they were charging for replacements. It did that through a program called “reference pricing”, adopted in 2011. As reported by Peter Ubel, in Pharma & Healthcare, the administration told California public employees that they could use any hospital and any orthopedic surgeon they wanted for a hip or knee replacement but their insurance would cover only $30, 000 of the hospital expenses.

If an employee wanted to use a hospital and surgeon who charged more than the $30, 000, he was free to do so but he would have to pay the extra cost himself. The results have been dramatic with the price of implant procedures dropping by more than 25%. Hospitals known as “high price hospitals” lost more than 20% of their implant business from the public employee population. Lower price hospitals saw their business go up.

Ubel reported that, in response to their lost business, high-priced hospitals dramatically reduced their fees. Not surprisingly, the new fees came in just under $30, 000. Reference pricing may turn out to be one of the most powerful ways to reduce the price of healthcare in the US, Ubel suggested.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy