LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Study Shocker: Smoking Not a TJR Risk Factor
Large Joints and Extremities

Study Shocker: Smoking Not a TJR Risk Factor

September 17, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study Shocker: Smoking Not a TJR Risk Factor
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Tibor Veigh
Secondary

Another presupposition is challenged. The reported association of smoking with the risk of undergoing a total joint replacement (TJR) due to osteoarthritis is not consistent enough to qualify as a risk factor, according to a major study in Australia.

Australian researchers examined the electronic records of 54, 288 men and women who were initially recruited for the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study. They linked those records to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to detect cases of total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) due to osteoarthritis.

The result? They found an inverse association between smoking and risk of THR and TKR in both men and women. Compared to non-smokers, male and female smokers were 40% and 30% less likely to undergo a TJR. This significant association persisted after controlling for age, co-morbidities, body mass index, physical exercise, and socioeconomic disadvantage.

They did find that the overweight and obese were significantly more likely to undergo a TJR compared to those with normal weight. However, socioeconomic status was not independently associated with a risk of either a THR or TKR.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy