LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Device-Free PVA System Cleared by FDA
Spine

Device-Free PVA System Cleared by FDA

September 19, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Device-Free PVA System Cleared by FDA
PVA Pod System / Courtesy: Crosstress Medical
Secondary

A novel bone cement delivery technology which does not require an implanted device in the spine has received FDA clearance.

Crosstrees Medical, Inc. announced on September 19, 2013 that its PVA (percutaneous vertebral augmentation) Pod System was cleared after a prospective, single-arm IDE (investigational device exemption) study with 135 patients in the U.S., China, Venezuela and Belgium compared the Crosstrees procedure to a literature control which included vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty outcomes.

According to the company, the IDE study met its primary endpoints of a significant reduction in pain scores and PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) bone cement extravasation over a follow-up period of 12 months. Additionally, the Crosstrees procedure demonstrated a significant reduction in new fracture rates often found with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures.

Robert Scribner, the company’s CEO and president, said the system was also CE-marked. “We believe that the Crosstrees technology offers the physician unprecedented control of PMMA delivery in vertebral augmentation and has demonstrated significantly improved procedural outcomes for patients.”

The company says the technology’s novel approach to PVA has been shown to significantly reduce new vertebral fractures post treatment where literature reported rates range from 23% to 48%. Devices using the technology feature a polymer material to control the delivery of a specific volume and geometry of PMMA bone cement to the vertebral fracture site. Following PMMA delivery, the construct is opened and removed from the vertebra, leaving only the PMMA filler material behind. The procedure involves steps familiar to physicians currently doing percutaneous vertebral augmentation and does not require an implanted device in the spine.

The system uses a soft woven fabric pod that allows the physician to control the flow of bone cement as it is injected into the vertebral body. This use of a fabric pod eliminates the balloon inflation step required in traditional kyphoplasty procedures. The system reduces the need for repeated device exchanges during the procedure. “The system design simplifies the procedure and potentially reduces procedure time, ” stated the company press release.

The technology presents “an important opportunity to improve PVA procedures…and offers unprecedented PMMA control which may reduce leakage complications, and the 12-month IDE study outcomes clearly demonstrate superior pain relief and reduced new fracture rates in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures, ” said Philip Yuan, M.D., of the Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group in Long Beach, California.  Dr. Yuan holds stock options in the company.

Crosstrees Medical was founded in 2003 to develop surgical techniques and procedures for vertebral fractures. The company is privately held and funded by Ascent Biomedical Ventures, Rho Ventures, and private individuals.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy