LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Consumer’s Union Urges Implant Guarantees
Large Joints and Extremities

Consumer’s Union Urges Implant Guarantees

September 19, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Consumer’s Union Urges Implant Guarantees
Courtesy of Consumer Reports
Secondary

In a clear challenge to the orthopedic industry, the official publication of the Consumer’s Union, Consumer Reports, called on implant manufacturers to offer warranties for their implants so that patients and taxpayers would not have to pay for a replacement when an implant fails.

According to the article, 20% of hip replacements and 10% of knee replacements are revisions—in many cases done because the original surgery or device or some combination of the two failed in some way. The author, Joel Keehn, argues that consumers of joint implants should have the same privilege as automobile purchasers have to take their cars back to a dealer to get a defective part fixed by the manufacturer/dealer.

Lisa McGiuffert, director of Consumers Union’s Safe Patient Project, notes that joint replacement patients do not get a warranty or guarantee in writing from the manufacturer of their device advising them as to how long their implant should last.

Consumers Union’s Safe Project Patient Project reports that hundreds of knee implant components have been recalled by their manufacturers for problems such as shipping a wrong size or a device with a missing part. The Union is urging the device manufacturers to provide patient purchasers of their devices with a 20 year warranty that would cover the entire cost of revision surgery, should it be needed, and an understandable system for patients to use in making claims—including toll-free telephone numbers. Doctors would charge the manufacturer of the implant, not the patient, for the costs associated with revision surgery.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy