The orthopedics department of Peking Third University, China, is printing bones with a 3-D printer and reporting good success when the bones are implanted into patients.
PKU Implants 3-D Printed Bones

“We started the clinical trial to test those implants last year, and all the patients participating in the trial are recovering well, ” says Liu Zhongjun, director of the department.
In cooperation with a Beijing medical device company that owns an imported 3-D printer, the hospital has produced dozens of hip replacements and artificial vertebral bodies. To date, more than 50 volunteer patients have tried the implants.
Liu believes that these tests are the first time that 3-D printed artificial vertebral bodies have been used in humans, although artificial vertebral bodies have been used in orthopedic surgeries for years.
The hospital uses titanium powder to print the implants. The 3-D printer is able to print titanium powder into any shape, as long as the computer that controls the printer has a digital model to follow. “In another words, ” Liu explains, “the 3-D printed orthopedic implants can match better with the bones around them than can traditional ones. Besides, the tiny pores of the new implants, another feature of the 3-D device, enable bones to grow into the implants.
Liu’s team launched the program in 2009. The hospital provided designing, and the medical device company digitalized the design. In mid-2010, the department started trials on sheep, and in 2012, the team got permission from health authorities for human trials. Liu believes that, “Producing medical devices through 3-D printing saves time and materials, and thus the cost will be lower than traditional methods.”

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.