LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Biomet’s Single-Use Delivery System for Fractures
Large Joints and Extremities

Biomet’s Single-Use Delivery System for Fractures

July 12, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Biomet’s Single-Use Delivery System for Fractures
ePAK Single-Use Delivery System / Courtesy: Biomet, Inc.
Secondary

Promising to reduce costs, Biomet, Inc. released the ePAK single-use delivery system for internal fracture fixation on July 9, 2013.

“We are excited to be the first orthopedic company to release a device in this category that addresses the needs of the orthopedic surgeon, patient, and the hospital system, ” said Wil Boren, president of Biomet Sports Medicine, Extremities and Trauma (SET).

A company statement said the system is a pre-sterilized, single-use procedure pack designed to add value by addressing the productivity needs of the operating room in one complete package that is designed to help save time, reduce cost, improve efficiency, and ultimately increase productivity.

The system addresses distal radius fractures and features Biomet’s DVR Crosslock implant and instrumentation. “With over 10 years of clinical heritage in treating distal radius fractures using the volar approach, the DVR plate and instrumentation continue to refine fracture fixation, ” said the statement.

Excluding the DePuy Trauma acquisition last year, Biomet’s SET division increased quarterly sales by 8% to $161.4 million for the latest quarter reported by the company. The increase was driven by significant Extremities growth of 22% globally and 29% in the U.S. on a constant currency basis.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy