LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Technology Holding Back Dumping Fee-for-Service
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Technology Holding Back Dumping Fee-for-Service

June 10, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Technology Holding Back Dumping Fee-for-Service
Image created by RRY Publications, LLC Source: Morguefile
Secondary

Private health insurers want to dump fee-for-service payments systems. The only thing holding them back is the lack of technology in exchanging information with doctors.

According to a Porter Research survey reported in the American Medical News (AMN) on May 27, 2013, 20% of health plans said at least half their business was “supported” by value-based payment models at the end of 2012. In three years, 45% of plans expect half their business to be supported by value-based payments. In five years, that number is expected to be 59%.

The survey was done on behalf of Availity, a health information network in Jacksonville, Florida, and included 39 insurers.

AMN reported that the survey found that 82% of health plans consider the development of new payment models a “major priority” for their organizations. Health insurers generally are making the biggest effort to convert from fee-for-service to value-based payments in their employer group plans, with 75% saying they were doing so. By comparison, 54% said Medicare plans were a priority for this transition, 46% said Medicaid plans were, and 44% named individual plans. Respondents could choose more than one answer.

Quality Versus Quantity

“The findings mirror other studies and discussions that have taken place in the wake of the Affordable Care Act and other reforms. Payers and others in the health industry view value-based payment models as a way to improve care and control costs by rewarding doctors for quality rather than the number of procedures performed or patients seen. Insurers have implemented pay-for-performance plans and joined doctors and hospitals in accountable care organizations to make the conversion from straight fee for service, ” noted the AMN article.

Automatic Information Exchanges

Technology was cited by the health plans as essential as they move to value-based payments. Ninety percent of insurers said automating information exchange is critical to the success of moving to such payments.

Advertisement

Less than 50% of insurers currently have real-time automation capabilities between themselves and doctors, and 90% said they use computers and paper for information exchanges.

The study, according to AMN, did not detail whether plans believed the lack of technology was because of problems on their end, or a result of many physicians just beginning to adopt electronic health records under the federal meaningful use program, or a combination of the two.

However, 75% of plans said they will automate information exchange with doctors in the next 12 to 18 months so they can begin to implement or expand value-based payment models.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy