LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Emergency Rooms Treat 20% in U.S.

Emergency Rooms Treat 20% in U.S.

June 17, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Emergency Rooms Treat 20% in U.S.
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Lepporello
Secondary

Approximately one in five adults in the U.S. went to an emergency room for care at least once in 2011, according to Nancy Walsh, writer for MedPage Today. The data comes from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) which reported that “the total number of visits to emergency departments increased 34% between 1995 and 2010—from 97 million to 130 million visits.” During the same period the number of emergency departments in the U.S. declined by 11% to 3, 700.

Adults age 75 and up made 27% of the visits to the emergency department and children younger than six made up 24%. Among Medicaid recipients, 38% used the emergency department at least once, as did 16% of those who had private insurance and 21% of those who had no insurance.

Writers of the report speculated that, “Persons with Medicaid may be sicker than the rest of the population and may find it more difficult to locate other sources of care, and these factors may be reflected in higher emergency department use among adults and children with Medicaid coverage.”

For children, 27% of the visits were for colds while 21% were for treatment of injuries. Injuries were the reason for 14% of the adult visits and injuries related to falls rose to 13% in adults 65 and older. Nine percent of adults complained of abdominal pain and 7% reported chest pain.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy