LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Mitek Launches Smaller Shoulder Repair Screw
Large Joints and Extremities

Mitek Launches Smaller Shoulder Repair Screw

May 29, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Mitek Launches Smaller Shoulder Repair Screw
Healix Advance Suture Anchors / Courtesy: DePuy Synthes Mitek
Secondary

Mitek Sports Medicine, part of the DePuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson, has launched the Healix 3.4mm Suture Anchor, the company’s smallest dual-thread suture anchor for rotator cuff repair. This is part of a new double-loaded minimally invasive partial thickness rotator cuff repair system—called the Healix Transtend Implant System.

The 3.4mm suture anchor is about 38% smaller than conventional suture anchors and features dual-thread technology, which, according to the company’s press release, engages both cortical and cancellous bone for optimal strength.

“The Healix 3.4mm anchor offers me the versatility of BR and PEEK options, and its small diameter enables more precise placement, and occupies less of the footprint than larger suture anchors, ” said Amir Moinfar, M.D., an orthopaedic surgeon and sports medicine specialist at Baltimore Washington Medical Center in Maryland. “However, despite its small size, the Healix 3.4mm anchor has the pullout characteristics needed for medial row fixation and the double-loaded orthocord gives me the opportunity for a variety of spanning options for incorporating lateral fixation.”

Mitek officials say that the Healix Transend implant system enables surgeons to repair a partially torn rotator cuff with optimal fixation strength and minimal trauma to surrounding intact tissue, adding that this percutaneous system maximizes procedural visualization and preserves the patient’s natural anatomy.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy