LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/DePuy Dumps Metal-on-Metal
Large Joints and Extremities

DePuy Dumps Metal-on-Metal

May 19, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

DePuy Dumps Metal-on-Metal
DePuy Complete System / Source: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Secondary

DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is discontinuing the use of metal liners in the company’s Ultamet metal-on-metal and Complete ceramic-on-metal hip systems.

Not a Recall

In a May 16, 2013 statement, the company said this is not a recall and the decision was made not out of safety concerns, but because of low clinician use of the systems and the availability of other options that meet the clinical needs of patients. The company also noted proposed changes in FDA regulations of the entire class of metal-on-metal products.

The discontinuation will be effective August 31, 2013 so surgeons will be able to plan accordingly for upcoming surgeries. The ceramic head used in Complete will continue to be available for use in other bearing surface combinations.

The discontinued metal liner was designed exclusively for use with DePuy’s Pinnacle Acetabular Cup System. The Pinnacle Cup will not be impacted by the move.

Streamlining Portfolio

According to the company, the decision was made in conjunction with an ongoing review of DePuy’s product portfolio. “Other worldwide product discontinuations will be announced throughout 2013 and 2014 that will simplify and streamline DePuy’s portfolio by focusing on fewer, worldwide strategic product platforms.”

90% Decline in Sales

Advertisement

Clinician use of ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearings is extremely low and not expected to increase. In the U.S. and Europe in 2012, metal-on-metal bearings comprised less than 2% of the bearings implanted. This, according to the company, represents a 90% decline in industry sales since 2007. Industry sales of ceramic-on-metal bearings have been low since their introduction to the market. Ultamet and Complete now represent less than 1% of DePuy bearings sold in these markets.

Shifting Physician Preferences

The company noted advancements in polyethylene bearing technology and the recent approval of next generation options. “Physician preferences have shifted toward metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic [CoC] bearings, ” said the statement. The options include the newly approved DePuy Ceramax total hip system with Biolox delta ceramic-on-ceramic 36MM large femoral head for use with the Pinnacle system. The company says physician use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings is widespread in Europe where, in 2012, CoC represented over one in five bearings used. The company believes CoC bearings also have considerable growth potential in the U.S. where new options are coming to market.

Regulatory Changes

The regulatory changes noted by the company refer to the January announcement by the FDA that the agency plans to require all metal-on-metal hip replacements with existing 510(k) clearances to be approved through the Premarket Approval (PMA) process. Ultamet was first cleared for sale through the 510(k) process in 2000. DePuy has communicated to the FDA its decision not to pursue a PMA submission for Ultamet.

The company made no reference to ongoing metal-on-metal litigation.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy