LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Smoking Slows Fracture Healing
Spine

Smoking Slows Fracture Healing

April 5, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Smoking Slows Fracture Healing
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Che
Secondary

Another reason to stop smoking, as if another were needed: Broken bones take longer to heal if the victims are smokers, reports Nancy Walsh, staff writer for MedPage Today, on March 24. In a systematic literature review and a random effects model meta-analysis that included 20 studies with 6, 500 patients and 1, 500 smokers, conducted by Mara Schencker, M.D. and her colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, they found that individuals who smoked had a 15% higher risk for the nonunion of fractures of the long bones and periarticular long bones than did nonsmokers.

“It’s been proposed that smoking may be detrimental to healing through mechanisms including vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, direct inhibition of cell function, and decreased collagen synthesis, ” said Schencker. Together, she added, these effects have been implicated in higher rates of nonunion both in arthrodesis and fracture studies and in greater complications in all surgical subspecialties.

Healing times for all fractures averaged 24.1 weeks for nonsmokers and 30.2 weeks for smokers, and times for tibia fractures were 25.1 weeks versus 32 weeks. Walsh reported that for tibial nonunions, smokers had a 15% higher risk and for open-fracture nonunions, the risk was increased by 12%, Schencker reported. There also were non-significant trends for increased incidence of infections. For deep infections, the rate was 7% for smokers and 2% for nonsmokers while the rates of superficial infections were 7% and 4%, respectively.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy