LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/SharedClarity Alarms Device Makers
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

SharedClarity Alarms Device Makers

April 12, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

SharedClarity Alarms Device Makers
Courtesy: SharedClarity
Secondary

On April 9, 2013, the biggest insurer in the U.S. and a large chain of hospitals announced they are teaming up to figure out if they’re getting their money’s worth from manufacturers of medical devices.

Mark West, president of the joint venture called SharedClarity, reportedly said one might call this the first stages of medical consumerism kicking in as patients and doctors become more aware of medical expenses and how to control them.

The insurer, UnitedHealth Group Inc. and the hospitals—Baylor Health Care System in Dallas, Dignity Health in San Francisco and Illinois-based Advocate Health Care—want to try to get a handle on skyrocketing costs and get unbiased ratings of various devices. The hospitals treat 7 million patients a year and UnitedHealthcare insures 40 million.

Device Scorecard

Jim Spencer reported in the StarTribune on April 11, 2013, that SharedClarity aims to provide a score card that rates the most widely used heart, neurological and orthopedic devices. The ratings will include such measures as performance, the need for replacement and readmission to hospitals.

The studies will lead to rankings of devices that doctors and other professionals in the SharedClarity network use to make treatment decisions. Test results will also help determine how UnitedHealthcare will cover devices.

West said that device manufacturers have been the primary testers of their own products. SharedClarity’s members are concerned that manufacturer funding and involvement in those studies influenced the results.

Nervous Manufacturers

Advertisement

The effort is making AdvaMed understandably nervous. The trade group put out a statement that said research should not be used to “deny patients and physicians their choice of the most appropriate treatment option.”

According to the announcement, physicians in the joint venture will study the performance of artificial hips, knees and other devices. UnitedHealthcare will share claims data. UnitedHealth Group’s Optum Labs will be a research partner with SharedClarity, as will the Lewin Group, another UnitedHealth subsidiary.

Group and Bulk Purchasing

West said individual health care systems in the SharedClarity system have committed to negotiate as a unit to buy their top-rated devices in bulk, garnering a better price for the often-used, costly products. UnitedHealth will use the study results to negotiate a separate, slightly less favorable price structure for devices that it will offer to all of its customers, West said in the StarTribune article. Those prices do not require bulk purchases.

The results of the device effectiveness studies will only be available to SharedClarity members initially, but the company may eventually make them available to the public at large.

The venture is actively recruiting new providers.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy