LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/TranS1 Acquires Baxano, Raises Capital
Company News

TranS1 Acquires Baxano, Raises Capital

March 7, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

TranS1 Acquires Baxano, Raises Capital
Courtesy: TranS1 Inc. and Baxano, Inc.
Secondary

“The combination of TranS1 Inc. and Baxano, Inc. creates a pure play MIS spine company with much greater scale, ” Ken Reali, Trans1’s CEO and president told OTW about the surprise announcement that Trans1 was acquiring Baxano.

TranS1 announced a definitive agreement on March 4, 2013, to acquire Baxano, a privately-held company that manufactures and markets the io-Flex system utilized in standard spine decompression surgery. Baxano is also developing the io-Tem system, a precision facetectomy instrument.

Up until now, TranS1 has been making tactical moves regarding codes and reimbursement for its AxiaLIF and VEO lumbar fusion products. We asked Reali about shifting into such a strategic mode.

“Minimally invasive treatments are the fastest growing segment of the spine market, ” said Reali. “The spine market is evolving toward MIS and more cost effective solutions. That fits with our vision and strategy. The fact that ‘newco’ will also be public gives us a stronger financial profile. Leveraging our core technologies of iO-Flex, AxiaLIF and VEO along with MIS technologies in development allows us to build a strong suite of synergistic MIS products, ” said Reali.

Piper Jaffray analyst Matt Miksic likes the deal, writing in an investor note on March 5: “The synergies of multiple lines of differentiated MIS technologies, serving specialists within spine surgery focusing on MIS makes strategic sense to us, and the deal also scales up the growth model significantly for the company over the next 2-3 years. In addition to its strategic positives, the financing associated with the deal will delay (but not eliminate) the need to raise additional cash, easing an overhang on TranS1 since January.”

TranS1 will issue approximately 10.4 million shares of its common stock and pay $550, 000 of cash (approximately $23.6 million of value based on the March 1, 2013 closing price) to acquire Baxano. TranS1 will also refinance $3 million of existing debt of Baxano. On a pro forma basis current TranS1 shareholders will own approximately 72.4% of the combined company and approximately 27.6% will be owned by current Baxano shareholders.

After acquisition is complete, Ken Reali and TranS1 Executive VP and CFO Joseph Slattery will continue to serve in their respective roles. The combined company’s corporate headquarters will be based in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Baxano had revenues of $3.9 million and $9.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. On a pro forma basis, the combined company’s revenues were approximately $24.0 million (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Advertisement

Contemporaneously with the execution of the acquisition, TranS1 entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement whereby the company agreed to sell approximately 7.5 million shares of the company’s common stock at a price of $2.28 per share, which will result in net proceeds of approximately $17.2 million.

“At the closing of the acquisition and financing transactions, we expect to have approximately $30 million in cash on the balance sheet, ” said Slattery. “With this additional capital, we are now in a position to demonstrate meaningful revenue growth on a pro forma basis.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy