LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hip Replacement More Painful for Women
Large Joints and Extremities

Hip Replacement More Painful for Women

March 6, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hip Replacement More Painful for Women
Tension Headache / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Shanghai Killer Whale
Secondary

Women have more problems with hip replacement surgery than do men. That is the conclusion of a study of more than 35, 000 cases of artificial hip implants by Maria Inacio, an epidemiologist with Southern California Permanente Medical Group in San Diego, California. Inacio conducted the study over a period of three years and found that the all-cause failure rate for women was 2.3% compared with 1.9% for men. About 57% of the patients in the study were women whose mean age was 65.7 years compared to 63.8 years for men.

Data for the study came from the Kaiser Permanente system’s registry of total joint replacements from 2001 to 2010. Procedures were performed at 46 hospitals in California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Colorado by 319 different surgeons. The researchers reported the results of their study online in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“One of the main reasons for failure [in women] is dislocation, and this can lead to a revision surgery, ” Inacio said. The risk appeared most prominent for aseptic revision compared with septic failure the researchers found. Larger femoral head sizes appeared especially problematic for women. For head sizes of 36 mm or more, the adjusted HR for failure in women versus men was 1.49 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.95), whereas differences in revision rates for smaller head sizes were not significant after adjustment.

John Gever, Senior Editor, MedPage Today noted, that preferences for fixation types also differed between men and women, with hybrid methods more common in the women and cementless fixation more common in men.

Delthia Ricks, writing about the study for Newsday, reported that the patients studied had received implants made from a variety of materials, including metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene; ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal. The metal-on-metal device was implanted least frequently in women but tended to cause the most problems, Inacio said.

Another similar study, reported by Ricks, was by Geoffrey Westrich, director of research at the Hospital for Special Surgery in Manhattan. In a study conducted over three years he reported, “We have tens of thousands of cases [in a database], and when I looked at our registry, we did not see that women fared worse than men in the short run.” But in a 2011 examination of 6, 000 cases, he found that women tended to wait longer before hip or knee joint replacement surgery, and that they report greater pain than do men.

In an accompanying commentary, reported by MedPage Today, Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., of the National Research Center for Women and Families in Washington, D.C., suggested that the study’s clinical implications were relatively trivial.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy