As if arthritis sufferers need another reason to get a hip or knee replaced, research presented to the 2013 annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) meeting found that joint replacement improved sexual function for 90% of the recipients. For the study 147 patients under the age of 70 who were scheduled for either a hip (THR-total hip arthroplasty) or knee (TKR-total knee arthroplasty) replacement agreed to participate. They filled out three questionnaires—one prior to their surgery, another at six months and a final one a year post surgery. Sixty-five percent of the patients completed all three surveys.
Better Sex With THR and TKR

The group of patients included 68 men and 78 women with a mean age of 57.7 years. Prior to their surgery, 67% of the patients reported physical problems with sexual activity. Their problems broke down to 67% pain, 36% stiffness; 49% reduced libido; and 14% inability to attain a proper position. Ninety-one percent of the participating patients reported psychological issues related to their osteoarthritis including 91% diminished general well-being, and 53%, diminished sexual self-image.
Following the surgery, 42% of the patients reported an improvement in libido; 41% reported increased intercourse duration; and 41% reported increased intercourse frequency. Eighty-four percent of the patients reported improvement in their general well-being, and 55% improvement in their sexual self-image.
Sixteen percent of patients reported that their joint replacement surgery adversely affected their sexual function, which was primarily due to a fear of damaging the replaced joint. Overall, 90% of THR and TKR patients reported improved overall sexual function, with a slightly higher rate of improvement after THR than TKR. More females reported improvement after THR than did males

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.