LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Strong Support for Surgeons in Patient Survey
Large Joints and Extremities

Strong Support for Surgeons in Patient Survey

February 1, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Strong Support for Surgeons in Patient Survey
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Damien Yerrick
Secondary

Laura Miller, writing in Becker’s Spine Review, reports the encouraging news that only 6% of patients in the United States are concerned about the financial relationships that may exist between their surgeons and representatives of the medical device industry.

However, a study published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, found that a majority of patients believed that surgeons should not accept gifts from representatives of industry.

The study questioned 251 patients in the United States, all of whom had undergone kip or knee arthroplasty, as to their attitudes toward the presumed relationships between orthopedists and representatives of the device industry. According to Miller, as reported in the Spine Review, the survey discovered that:

  • 69% of patients thought it was appropriate for surgeons to receive royalties from device companies for their inventions
  • 48% thought payment for consultancy was appropriate
  • 63% thought it was not appropriate for surgeons to receive gifts from industry
  • 76% felt their surgeon would hold the patients’ best interest in mind regardless of financial ties to a manufacturer
  • 86% wanted professional organizations to ensure financial relationships were appropriate
  • 26% supported government oversight of relationships between surgeons and device companies.”
React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy