LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/DePuy Recalls Another Metal Hip
Company News

DePuy Recalls Another Metal Hip

February 25, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

DePuy Recalls Another Metal Hip
Source: www.mhra.gov.uk
Secondary

While a jury listens to evidence about Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy Orthopaedics’s failed ASR metal-on-metal hip replacement device in a Los Angeles courtroom, the company issued a field safety notice on January 15, 2013 for physicians and consumers for the Adept 12/14 Modular Head used in total hip replacement. This was done after reviewing revision rates of the device from the UK National Joint Registry Supplier Feedback data and the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

The notice stated that a review of post-market surveillance data suggests a higher-than-expected revision rate for the head when used in conventional total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of UK National Joint Registry Supplier Feedback data (download 11th November 2012) indicates a cumulative revision rate of 12.1% at seven years for the head when used in conventional total hip arthroplasty.

When this combination is used with the Adept cementless stem, the data showed a cumulative revision rate of 9.7% at five years. This is based on 17 revisions in a cohort of 195 implantations.

The head was manufactured by Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd., which was acquired by DePuy in December 2009. The devices were available commercially from Finsbury or DePuy from 2004 to September 2011. From September 2011, the heads were acquired by MatOrtho Ltd. DePuy issued the field safety notice due to its responsibility for monitoring ongoing performance of the product.

Sales of the device were reportedly halted in 2011, but apparently 7, 500 of the implants spread to 21 different countries including the UK, Germany, Denmark, Australia and Canada. None were sold in the U.S.

The notice involves the top part of the devices and the company notes that a similarly named product called the Adept Hip Resurfacing Femoral Components was not recalled.

Customer Directions

Customers are being told that if they have any remaining inventory to please cease further distribution or use of the product with immediate effect.

Advertisement

The company is asking customers to undertake the following urgent actions:

  • Quarantine/Bond any Adept 12/14 Modular Head inventory that is located at your facility or hospital
  • Arrange with your local DePuy representative to return for credit any unused implants
  • Please sign and return a confirmation/reconciliation letter to the specified DePuy contact
  • Please ensure all departments and colleagues within your organization who are impacted by this Field Safety Corrective Action notification are made aware of this action

Patient Care

Patients who have received the Adept head should be followed according to local guidance/standard of care for patients receiving metal-on-metal articulations.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy