LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Mesoblast Tees Up Phase 3 Stem Cell Spine Test
Spine

Mesoblast Tees Up Phase 3 Stem Cell Spine Test

January 29, 2013 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Mesoblast Tees Up Phase 3 Stem Cell Spine Test
Mesoblast cell division. Courtesy of Mesoblast
Secondary

Mesoblast Limited’s NeoFuse stem cell product showed positive results in the firm’s Phase 2 lumbar spinal fusion trial, according Mesoblast Chief Executive Silviu Itescu speaking at the annual JP Morgan Healthcare Conference in San Francisco. The results suggest that Mesoblast’s NeoFuse product comprising allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) is as effective for interbody lumbar fusion as the gold standard, bone autograft, without the need for a second surgical procedure and its attendant morbidity risks. These results, Itescu said, support the progression of NeoFuse to a Phase 3 trial in interbody lumbar fusion.

Researchers enrolled 24 patients in five sites in the United States with 8 patients in each treatment arm—one was bone autograft standard of care, which was the control group, with the second group receiving 25 million MPCs and the third 75 million MPCs . Patients underwent the surgical procedure, one or two level fusions using a posterior approach to the spine, and were evaluated for safety and efficacy. The median follow-up times for the three treatment groups were 23.9, 20.7, and 22.9 months for the bone autograft and the two stem cell groups, respectively.

MPCs were well tolerated with no cell-related serious adverse events and no ectopic bone formation at all. The MPC treated groups had a 30% to 43% lower mean estimated blood loss during surgery compared to the autograft treatment group. At 12 months, fusion was achieved in 85.7% of the patients in the 25 million treatment group compared to 62.5% in the 75 million and 75% in the control patient groups.

Overall, patients from all three treatment groups had a clinically significant and comparable decrease in low back and leg pain, assessed on the Visual Analogue Scale and functional improvement, assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire.

Randall Dryer, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon with the Central Texas Spine Institute and an investigator in Mesoblast’s study, said: “For patients whose spinal discs have degenerated too extensively for repair, bony fusion of adjacent vertebra is the primary option to eliminate chronic and debilitating pain. Other than autograft, there is no approved product for posterior spinal fusion, a surgical approach which accounts for 62% of all lumbar fusion procedures. There is a critical unmet need for new technologies to achieve fusion that are safe, effective, and that eliminate the need for bone autograft.” Dryer added, “Based upon my experience in the Phase 2 study, Mesoblast’s cells may provide a significant and valuable option to achieve fusion in patients with severe spinal disc degeneration and these results warrant progressing to a Phase 3 study.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy