LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hip Revision Risk Factors Identified
Large Joints and Extremities

Hip Revision Risk Factors Identified

January 15, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hip Revision Risk Factors Identified
Xray of hip replacement. Source: Wikimedia Commons and Bill Rhodes
Secondary

Which patients are most at risk for having to have a hip replacement procedure? A study conducted at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School found that “younger, taller and heavier patients, and those receiving a cemented femoral component, had greater likelihood of undergoing a revision total hip replacement over a 12-year follow-up period.”

Researchers examined data on patients who had a hip replaced between July 1995 and June 1996, each of whom was matched with a control patient. They looked at 719 pairs of patients, as well as their hospital records, in order to observe any potential risk factors. They found that patients who were aged 75 or under at the time of their initial surgery were more likely to need revision surgery than those who were older. Taller patients were also more likely to need revision surgery, as were those with a high body weight.

Investigators published their findings, believed to be the first such U.S. study to look for risk factors for hip replacement revision surgery, in the journal Arthritis Care & Research. They recommended that, “Effects of age and body size on revision risk should be addressed by clinicians with patients considering primary total hip replacement.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy