LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Medicare Advantage More Efficient
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Medicare Advantage More Efficient

December 17, 2012 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Medicare Advantage More Efficient
Source: NPR/Kaiser Family Foundation Analysis of the CMS Medicare Advantage Files 2011
Secondary

A research team consisting of four Harvard professors, a researcher from the National Committee for Quality Assurance and L. Gregory Pawlson, from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation, found that Medicare Advantage (MA HMO) plans may be offering more efficient patient care than do Medicare Part A and B plans.

As reported by Anthony Brino, in Health Care Finance News, the team found MA HMO enrollees had 25% to 35% fewer emergency department visits, compared to traditional Medicare enrollees, and had 20% to 25% fewer inpatient medical days. MA HMO plans also had fewer ambulatory surgeries and procedures than in traditional Medicare, with ambulatory utilization 25% lower in 2003, before narrowing to 7% by 2008.

The authors studied rates of medical and surgical hospitalizations, outpatient visits, ambulatory procedures, emergency department visits and 12 specific surgical procedures, and compared MA HMO plans to Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services (CMS) enrollment and claims data from a random sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries, adjusted for demographic factors.

According to Brino, inpatient surgical days initially were lower in MA HMOs, but by 2007 they had started to mirror traditional Medicare rates. HMO outpatient visit rates were also about 10% lower in the mid-2000s, before converging by 2009. Rates of elective knee and hip replacements were about 10% lower in Medicare Advantage HMOs for existing plans and were almost 20% lower for new plans after 2007.

The findings suggest that MA HMOs “may be able to treat a given patient with greater efficiency while attaining equal or superior quality through their flexibility in enrollee benefits, network contracting and coordination of care.” The team compared data from MA HMO and traditional Medicare plans from 2003 to 2009.

Brino reported that about a quarter of all Medicare beneficiaries, or 12.8 million, are enrolled in MA plans, up from 4.6 million a decade earlier. HMOs now account for 65% of MA enrollment. In 2003 the Medicare Modernization Act increased payments to participating plans that “made the program more attractive to beneficiaries because competition among plans and regulations led plans to pass along most of the extra payments to beneficiaries in the form of enhanced benefits or lower premiums, ” the authors wrote.

This first national analysis of MA HMO plans comes amid what Brino called booming enrollment in Medicare, an increase in Medicare Advantage enrollment and also concern for fixing Medicare’s cost and spending problems. The Department of Health and Human Services recently announced that MA plans are projected to increase enrollment by 11% in 2013 and that average premium prices will remain unchanged. Since 2010, MA premiums have decreased an average of 10% and enrollment in these plans has increased by 28%.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy