LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hand-Held Robotic Device Cleared for TKAs
Large Joints and Extremities

Hand-Held Robotic Device Cleared for TKAs

December 24, 2012 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hand-Held Robotic Device Cleared for TKAs
Courtesy Blue Belt Technologies
Secondary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the Navio PFS system, made by Blue Belt Technologies, Inc., for performing unicondylar knee replacement (UHR) surgeries. Company officials say the system aims to provide improved control to surgeons when they are shaving the bone tissue in preparation for placement of an implant. Blue Belt is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The NavioPFS consists of a 3D camera, a visualization system, and a handheld resurfacing device that provides real-time robotic control of the tip in a manner that is similar to a CAD/CAM. The system received European approval in February 2012 and the device has since been used in surgeries in Belgium and the UK.

Blue Belt literature describes the NavioPFS™ surgical system as a device that packs advanced robotic technology into a handheld form. The PFS hand-piece embodies multiple intelligent control algorithms that allow the surgeon to precisely resurface bone based on a predefined plan. The navigation system, which tracks real-time position of the hand-piece, allows only the targeted bone to be removed while the robotics enforces a safety zone.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy