LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Safety of Steroid Shots Questioned
Spine

Safety of Steroid Shots Questioned

November 12, 2012 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Safety of Steroid Shots Questioned
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Armin Kübelbeck
Secondary

How safe are epidural steroids shots when they are injected into the space around the spinal cord? A study by researcher Shalom Mandel, M.D. of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, presented at the recent meeting of the North American Spine Society, raised new concerns about the injections that are used to treat millions of back pain sufferers.

“For a patient population already at risk for bone fractures, steroid injections carry a greater risk than previously thought, ” said Mandel.

Researchers at Henry Ford Hospital examined data on 6, 000 patients treated for back pain between 2007 and 2010. They treated half of the patients with at least one epidural steroid shot and the other half never received the treatment. According to the analysis, spinal fracture risk increased by 29% with each steroid shot. The researchers are quick to point out that this was an association, and does not prove cause and effect.

Steroid treatments, such as those taken orally or by IV, have long been linked to bone loss. However, epidural steroid shots were thought to have little impact on bones because they were delivered directly to the problem area and thus had less effect on the rest of the body. Mandel says this may not be the case.

If epidural steroids are causing fractures, it is probably because the treatment is not localized, ” he said. “The drug may be entering the circulatory system.

The final word is that more study is needed.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy