LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Time to Stress Test PRP and Stem Cell Products
Biologics

Time to Stress Test PRP and Stem Cell Products

October 2, 2012 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Time to Stress Test PRP and Stem Cell Products
Mitosis fluorescent. Source: Wikimedia Commons and National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Secondary

For years platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used to treat tendons for injury and degeneration—with more anecdotal evidence than high level scientific study based evidence. The same has been true of the use of stem cells. Recently researchers at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) have been awarded a $100, 000 grant from the National Football League (NFL) Charities to research the use of PRP and stem cells as treatments for tendon injury. NFL players and other athletes suffer from tendon overuse injuries and they need new treatments.

“We don’t have a treatment that works 100 percent of the time, so there is room for improvement, ” said Scott Rodeo, M.D., co-chief of the Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service for Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City. “Many people are weekend warriors and they suffer from tendon overuse injuries. Hopefully, our study will be able to help a lot of these people.” Rodeo, who will be heading up the research, has been associate team physician for the New York Football Giants since 2000.

Researchers hope that their work will lead to the development of an effective therapeutic strategy for tendinopathy that will allow NFL players to return to competition more quickly. It may also lead to a decrease in complications related to tendinosis, such as tendon ruptures. Tendinosis is caused by repetitive microtears in the connective tissue in and around the tendon along with a failure of the body to mount a full healing response. Over time tendinosis leads to pain, reduced tensile strength and the chance of tendon rupture.

The grant money will be used to investigate how degenerated tendons respond to PRP and bone marrow-derived stem cells as well as if these two treatments will be synergistic if they are combined. Among the goals of the research are to examine the structural and mechanical properties of the treated tendon tissue to see how it responds to PRP and stem cells.

In recent years, physicians have found that some, but not all, patients with tendon disorders respond to treatment with PRP. PRP contains cells and growth factors that may stimulate healing of bone and soft tissue. Researchers surmise the mixed results may be caused by variations in preparation, timing, dosage and delivery of platelets, or differences in bioactivity.

Different PRP preparations contain different amounts of cell and growth factors. The researchers speculate that the studies that had negative results may have used PRP preparations with low bioactivity. To test this theory, researchers will test the bioactivity levels of the preparations used. Further, the researchers hope to be able to address the question of whether PRP treatments actually help heal the tendon structure or just ameliorate the pain.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy