Doctors in the United Kingdom are not telling their patients about the benefits of exercise, to their detriment, according to a new study conducted by researchers from University College London, and published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. The problem begins, the study states, with the medical schools which fail to provide adequate teaching on exercise in the physicians’ undergraduate courses. The authors wrote that such teaching was “sparse or non-existent” and that half of medical students were not being taught the advantages of exercise.
UK Doctors Ignoring Benefits of Exercise

The authors of the study note that the “largely sedentary” lifestyle of people in the UK is one of the leading causes of chronic disease. The researchers, led by Richard Weiler, M.D., a sports and exercise medicine consultant at University College, London, NHS Foundation Trust, revealed that only half of the 31 medical schools taught the doctors-to-be about existing physical activity guidance from the chief medical officer.
Weiler noted that specific teaching on exercise was not included at all in the undergraduate courses of five British medical schools. Students spent 109 hours, on average, learning about pharmacology, while a “negligible” 4.2 hours were spent on physical activity.
Terming the disquieting omission of teaching on exercise for students in medical schools as “lunacy, ” Weiler said, “We throw money at teaching them about drugs but not about how to prevent and treat chronic disease through exercise.” The study was reported by Stephen Adams in the July 28 news release in The Telegraph.

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.