LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Second Quarter FDA Ortho Approvals
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Second Quarter FDA Ortho Approvals

August 3, 2012 3 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Second Quarter FDA Ortho Approvals
Source: Wikimedia Commons and FitzColinGerald
Secondary

Now that second quarter orthopedic sales results are in, we thought we’d bring you the second quarter Premarket Approvals (PMA) Original and Supplemental Approvals from the FDA.

The FDA approved 6 Original PMAs during the quarter while granting 315 positive Supplemental Approvals during the quarter. None of the Original PMAs were related to orthopedic devices.

Original PMA decision times (receipt to decision) increased from 113.2 days in in April to 221.8 days in June. The FDA portion of that decision time went from 92.7 days in April to 188.6 days in June. 

April 2012

Four Non-Orthopedic Related Original (PMA) Approvals:
  • Bond Oracle Her2 IHC System  for Leica Biosystems Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Presillion plus CoCr Coronary Stent on RX System for Medinol Ltd. Tel-Aviv, Israel

  • Architect HBsAg Qualitative Calibrators and Controls for Abbott Laboratories Abbott Park, Illinois

  • Epic Vascular Self-Expanding Stent System for Boston Scientific Corporation Maple Grove, Minnesota

  • Orthopedic-Related Supplemental Approvals:
    Exactech, Inc., Gainesville, Florida
    • Novation Ceramic Articulation Hip System (AHS)

    Advertisement

    Approval for use of an additional package sealer for the acetabular liner and femoral head sterile barrier packaging processes

    • Novation Ceramic AHS Articulation Hip System

    Approval for changes to the Novation AHS Instructions for Use to reorganize information for clarity, remove information that is redundant, and ensure consistency

    DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana
    • DePuy Pinnacle CoMplete Acetabular Hip System

    Approval for the addition of the Trilock BPS (Bone Preserving Hip Stem) to the list of compatible femoral stem components. The device, as modified, will be marketed under the trade name DePuy Pinnacle CoMplete Acetabular Hip System and is indicated as a single use device intended for uncemented fixation. The device is intended as a primary joint replacement prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty for skeletally mature patients suffering at least moderate pain in the hip joint from non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) and its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis (OA) or post-traumatic arthritis. The device’s inserts (Pinnacle Ultamet) are only intended for use with DePuy’s femoral and acetabular components having matching outer and inner diameters.

    • Duraloc Option Ceramic Hip System

    Changes to the sterile barrier package sealing process used for the ceramic femoral heads and acetabular liners

    • Ceramax Total Hip System

    Advertisement

    Changes to the sterile barrier package sealing process used for the ceramic femoral heads and acetabular liners

    • CoMplete Acetabular Hip System

    Changes to the sterile barrier package sealing process used for the ceramic femoral heads and acetabular liners

    May 2012

    No PMA Approvals
    Orthopedic-Related Supplemental Approvals
    Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Plainsboro Township, New Jersey
    • Integra Artificial Skin, Dermal Regeneration Template, Integra Dermal Regeneration Template – Terminally Sterilized (IDRT-ts)

    Approval for a manufacturing site located at Integra Neurosciences in Anasco, Puerto Rico

    • Integra Dermal Regeneration Template – Terminally Sterilized (IDRT-ts)

    Approval for a manufacturing site located at Synergy Health AST, LLC in Denver, Colorado

    Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
    • Synvisc and Synvisc-One

    Advertisement

    Approval for the addition of a new product data and laboratory information management system

    June 2012

    Two Non-Orthopedic Related Original (PMA) Approvals:
    • Glaukos iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent (Models: GTS-100R, GTS-100L) and inserter (GTS-l00i). Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, California

  • Access Hybritech p2PSA on the Access Immunoassay Systems. Beckman Coulter, Inc., Chaska, Minnesota

  • Orthopedic-Related Supplemental Approvals
    Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis and Cordova, Tennessee
    • Reflection Ceramic Hip System

    Approval for addition of an alternate site for the machining processes for R3 Acetabular Shells

    • Exogen 4000+ Ultrasound Bone Healing System

    Change in supplier

    DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana
    • Duraloc Ceramic Hip

    Advertisement

    Approval of the post-approval study protocol

    • Duraloc Option Ceramic Hip System

    Changes to the device sterile packaging

    • Ceramax Ceramic Total Hip System

    Changes to the device sterile packaging

    • Pinnacle CoMplete Ceramic-on-Metal Acetabular Hip System

    Changes to the device sterile packaging

    Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee
    • Infuse Bone Graft

    Approval for the proposed labeling revisions related to the appearance of the reconstituted product and warning statement about use in patients suspected of having cancer at the product application site

    React:

    Discussion

    14
    DS
    Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

    This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

    8
    JT
    James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

    Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

    5
    RP
    R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

    We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

    Join the conversation

    Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

    Subscribe

    Get Full Access

    Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

    Get Full Access

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Orthopedics This Week

    The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

    A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

    LinkedInXFacebook

    Categories

    • Spine
    • Joints
    • Upper Extremities
    • Foot & Ankle
    • Sports Medicine
    • Pain Mgmt
    • Trauma
    • Biologics
    • Technology
    • People
    • Company News
    • Legal & Regulatory

    Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Community Posts
    • Job Board
    • Press Release Opportunities
    • Power Rankings
    • About OTW
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us

    Get Full Access

    Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

    Get Full Access

    Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

    © 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

    Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy