LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Biomet Spine Proclaims “Game Changing” Screw Technology
Spine

Biomet Spine Proclaims “Game Changing” Screw Technology

August 16, 2012 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Biomet Spine Proclaims “Game Changing” Screw Technology
Translation Screw Courtesy Biomet Spine
Secondary

Biomet Spine proclaimed a “game changing” technology on August 14, 2012 when the company announced the FDA 510(k) clearance for its next generation occipito-cervico-thoracic system – the Lineum OCT Spine System.

The company says the system incorporates “first to market, game changing Translation screw technology.” The technology, according to the company, is the first “game changing” screw technology since the advent of the multi-axial screw.

The technology, states a company press release, offers 3mm of medial/lateral translation to encourage optimal screw placement, requires less rod manipulation, and allows easier rod introduction.

“Commercialization of multi-axial screws changed the manner by which surgeons approached screw placement, ” said Bill Messer, general manager of Biomet Spine. Messer believes the new screw will have a similar “game changing” impact on posterior OCT spine procedures.

In addition to the new screw, the company says this system incorporates numerous enhancements designed to encourage procedural efficiency. These include a broader range of customizable construct options, a new adjustable depth drill guide and new rod reducers.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy