LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Spinal Restoration Completes Back Pain Enrollment Study
Spine

Spinal Restoration Completes Back Pain Enrollment Study

July 12, 2012 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Spinal Restoration Completes Back Pain Enrollment Study
Courtesy: ClinicalTrials.gov and Spinal Restoration
Secondary

The lack of definitive answers over the source of lower back pain continues to confound surgeons and patients and give payers fodder to limit payment coverage.

However, addressing and understanding discogenic pain may have taken a step forward when Austin-based Spinal Restoration, Inc. announced on July 11, the completion of enrollment in the Phase III Investigational New Drug (IND) study of the company’s Biostat System.

According to the company’s web site, research indicates that a specific diagnosis of back pain can only be made in 20% of cases based upon neurological evaluation and imaging studies. Discography studies show that approximately four million patients annually, have back pain attributable to disruptions of the internal structure within the intervertebral discs. This condition, referred to as discogenic pain, currently has no widely accepted therapy other than surgical spinal fusion.

The company believes that application of the system’s fibrin sealant to the disc may alleviate discogenic pain by sealing the painful disc disruptions, reducing inflammation, and enhancing tissue repair.

Clinical Trial

The Phase III clinical trial is a 260-subject, randomized, blinded, placebo controlled study designed to assess the ability of the Biostat System to reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. The study is being conducted at 20 centers across the U.S.

The Principal Investigator Kevin Pauza, M.D., of Spine Specialists in Tyler, Texas, made quite a stir on May 6, 2012, when a national TV program (CBS Sunday Morning) focused attention on the Phase III clinical study.

The purpose of the investigation is to establish the safety and efficacy of the Biostat System when used for treatment of chronic low back (lumbar) pain due to symptomatic internal disc disruptions (IDD) by comparing safety and efficacy outcome measures between one group receiving Biostat Biologx Fibrin Sealant through the Biostat Delivery Device and another group receiving a preservative-free normal saline control delivered with the same delivery device.

Potential Far-Reaching Impact

The study is, “one of the most ambitious clinical studies ever attempted by interventional spine physicians, ” said Gary Sabins, president and CEO of Spinal Restoration. “If successful, the Phase III study of the Biostat System could have an extensive, far-reaching impact on the diagnosis and treatment of millions of patients who suffer from the debilitating effects of chronic discogenic low back pain.”

Advertisement

The company believes the system is the first intradiscal biologic therapy for discogenic pain to complete enrollment of a Phase III IND study. Enrollment of the study was initiated in 2010 after the company reached Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) concurrence with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the study design, endpoints, and planned statistical analysis. Study success will be determined by comparing the success rates of the investigational and control groups at the six-month primary endpoint.

Under an SPA, the FDA is supposed to grant clearance if certain pre-set, agreed upon criteria are met upon the final data analysis. This should be a good measure of the FDA’s new emphasis and commitment to promoting innovation.

Additional information about the Biostat System study is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Study identifier: NCT01011816). Spinal Restoration expects the outcomes from this study, along with data from its previous preclinical and pilot clinical studies, to provide the basis for a Biologic License Application to the FDA in 2013.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy