First The Wall Street Journal reported that the former Stryker Corporation CEO was gunning for a job with his old employer, Johnson & Johnson. Now Massdevice.com reported on June 13, that with the DePuySynthes merger completed and rumors of Steve MacMillan “looking like a good fit” to run the new ortho business, would his two-year non-compete agreement with Stryker stand in the way?
MacMillan to DePuySynthes?

The two-year non-compete clause MacMillan signed with Stryker in his February 2012 separation agreement, which paid him $5.5 million in cash and the rights to purchase nearly $65 million worth of stock options seems to be a huge hurdle.
Under the terms of that agreement, which forbids MacMillan directly or indirectly to “own, manage, operate, join, control, be employed by, or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or otherwise be connected in any manner with, including, without limitation, holding any position as a shareholder, director, officer, consultant, independent contractor, employee or partner of, spokesman for, or investor in, any business which is competitive with (x) the businesses of the company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, ” according to a regulatory filing.
Before joining Stryker and after a stint at Global Specialty Operations of Pharmacia Corporation, MacMillan served as president of Johnson & Johnson—Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals. He had held numerous other roles at Johnson & Johnson since 1989, including vice president, marketing and professional sales at McNeil Consumer Specialty Pharmaceuticals, and managing director of the UK subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson MSD (Merck). He began his career with Procter & Gamble in 1985, where he held various marketing positions.

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.