LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/People In The News/Mahoney’s Move to Boston Scientific Stirs Takeover Rumors
People In The News

Mahoney’s Move to Boston Scientific Stirs Takeover Rumors

September 14, 2011 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Mahoney’s Move to Boston Scientific Stirs Takeover Rumors
Mike Mahoney

Mike Mahoney is leaving Johnson & Johnson (J&J) to replace Ray Elliott as president and CEO of Boston Scientific Corp.

Elliott, the former head of Zimmer Holdings, Inc. before taking over Boston Scientific, had announced his intention to step down in May.

To accommodate post-employment obligations to J&J, Mahoney will become Boston Scientific’s president on October 17 and is expected to become CEO next year on November 1, 2012. Elliott will remain on the company’s board and assist Mahoney through the end of the year.

Unusual Transition

Larry Biegelsen, senior analyst at Wells Fargo, said what’s interesting to him about this September 14 announcement is that J&J and Boston Scientific have both agreed to this unusual transition plan. “It strikes us as a friendly agreement between two companies that have been fierce rivals over recent years and have litigated against each other extensively in the stent space. Given J&J’s recent exit from the stent business, we think this announcement could fuel additional speculation about J&J’s eventually acquiring Boston Scientific.”

Mahoney was in charge of J&J’s DePuy orthopedics business before taking over as head of J&J’s medical device and diagnostic group in January. Before joining DePuy, Mahoney was with General Electric Medical Systems. He will be in charge of Boston Scientific’s cardiac rhythm management and endoscopy businesses starting in October, and will take over the neuromodulation business next August.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy