LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/People In The News/Jay Farris Joins SBi
People In The News

Jay Farris Joins SBi

July 12, 2011 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Jay Farris Joins SBi
Jay Farris

A focus on sales and safety…Small Bone Innovations, Inc. (SBi) has announced that Jack ‘Jay’ Farris, a 20-year veteran of medical device and health care product sales, service and marketing, has joined the company as National Sales Director, North America.

Farris, who helped to transform manufacturer sales strategies to hospital ‘C-suite’ executives and effect a transition from single-use to the more cost effective reprocessing of medical devices, will report to Anthony G. Viscogliosi, SBi Chairman & Chief Executive Officer. He will have direct responsibility for sales of the company’s SB&J portfolio in North America, including its market leading STAR total ankle replacement system.

“Jay pioneered a strategy and developed a team at Alliance Medical and its successor companies that helped spur rapid sales growth among hospital purchasing authorities. His experience and drive will be invaluable in building SBi’s sales organization as we enter the next phase of the STAR ankle program and consolidate our market leadership in upper and lower limb technologies, ” Viscogliosi said in the July 6, 2011 news release.

Farris added: “I have followed the impressive trajectory of SBi’s growth and leadership in the SB&J market, led by the remarkable STAR ankle technology. There are many parallels between the development of medical device reprocessing and total ankle arthroplasty. For example, the need to persuade Chief Safety Officers, as well as other decision-makers in the hospital purchasing chain of command, to appreciate STAR’s cost effectiveness and safety features versus fusion in treating a complex disease such as ankle arthritis.”

Earlier in his career, Farris held senior sales positions with Paragon Healthcare Corp., a device reprocessing company and the surgical services company, Medical Alliance Inc., where he began to establish extensive links with hospitals, surgeons and other health care providers in North America.

Farris told OTW,

When the industry first began to raise the issue of reprocessing devices, such as catheters, endo-mechanical and orthopedic devices, we hit a brick wall. We went ahead–led by visionaries such as Tony Viscogliosi–and through a specifically designed Roadmap and AIM process, began working closely with major hospitals and IDNs such as the Mayo Clinic that ended up supporting the concept of reprocessing. It became clear that –if anything–reprocessing devices was not only cost effective but there were safety benefits due to extensive FDA regulation, as well as significant reductions in landfill waste. It has taken a decade to convince surgeons, hospitals and the FDA that total ankle replacement, when correctly prescribed, will be superior to fusion. Like device reprocessing, it takes volumes of scientific data to displace a Gold Standard procedure but in the case of the STAR ankle, the FDA (via the PMA process) and even the health insurance industry, is behind it. In a nutshell, this is why I joined SBi.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy